New Zodiac Signs

Don’t fret y’all! This is FALSE. ? came to my rescue! This is not my area of expertise, although I find it very interesting. :smileyvery-happy:

? well, now it all makes sense!!!! :cattongue: :heart:

It’s a false rumor, no worries. 

AH, it’s all good. I am fine I am still a true LEO!

?

You had me worried for a moment. I am fine now.:smileyhappy:

?

Thanks for the info Faire:heart:

This better not be true:womanlol: I am a true LEO!

This will really P….me Off!:womansurprised:

Faire where are you?:womanlol::womanhappy:

 Sweet KemiQueen. – Not completely true i!! NASA  (scientist) has  always claimed they don’t even believe in astrology  but rather believe in astronomy .  I’m not buying it .  It’s based on the placement of the planets at time of your birth. Time  by Geenwith Mean time .  I  look this up is it ” blew my mind”. it says that the Western world has always use tropical zodiac, the seasonal based   Astrology has not changed and was never oriented to the constellations .  People who believe in the sidereal (constellation) has  Changed.  The hubbub started with Sundays Tribune article saying Babylonians based zodiac signs where the constellations placement of the sun was on the day a person  was born .  There is a new one called 0phiuchus.  However,  The tropical zodiac, the start of Aries is fixed in one equinox, and libra the other .  Seasonal based astrology has not changed and was never oriented to the constellations .   From a flower child in the 60s and 70s !!!! Lol

 NASA  (scientist) has  always claimed they don’t even believe in astrology  but rather believe in astronomy .  I’m not buying it .  It’s based on the placement of the planets at time of your birth. Time  by Geenwith Mean time .  I  look this up is it ” blew my mind”. it says that the Western world has always use tropical zodiac, the seasonal based   Astrology has not changed and was never oriented to the constellations .  People who believe in the sidereal has Changed.  The hubbub started with Sundays Tribune article saying Babylonians based zodiac signs on the constellations the sun was in on the day of person was born .  There is a new one called 0phiuchus.  And tropical zodiac, the start of Aries is fixed in one equinox, and libra the other .  Seasonal based astrology has not changed and was never oriented to the constellations .   From a flower child in the 60s and 70s !!!! Lol

Another fake internet/email story.

Kemiqueen, this is interesting.  Everything changes over time so I wondered about the Signs and if they have changed.  I have to admit to being completely ignorant on the subject and appreciate FaireMaiden responses.  

Thank you FM.

What the heck is Ophiuchus? I’m still a Leo no matter what NASA says!! :smileyfrustrated: Grrrrr

-RetlawG

Wait, wait, wait a minute!!!!!  Is this really true?  Oh please tell me this is a hoax or mix up of some kind……….:womansurprised:

I have never felt like my sign fit me .Maybe 15% describes me.So I don’t pay it much attention..I do pay attention to Mercury Retrograde,etc because I plan for those events.

I agree, its a bunch of rubbish. ? don’t worry you still a Pisces:womanvery-happy: 

Monday, September 12-2016… This is all hooey. And, I’m quite surprised, tho I shouldn’t be, that the scientific community, (who has ALWAYS and EVER criticized  Zodiacal Astrology), is now poking their nose into matters they have absolutely NO expertise in. It’s right up there with relegating Pluto a non-Planet! *lol*

Ophiuchus IS NOT an Astrological/Zodiacal Sign… it’s a Constellation. And, while Astrology has always been aware of Ophiuchus, it has no place, and holds no sway, in Astrological considerations. It’s just one more ploy, (by the scientific community), to denegrate Astrology by adding Ophiuchus; thus attempting to relegate 6,000-years of Astrological knowledge, calculation, and wisdom to the rubbish-bin. Shame on them!

In response to Pookie’s insert below, I would like to point out that ‘Horoscopes’, as found in Newspapers and Magazines, are completely bogus. Why? Because changes in one’s life/fortune are based on the Moon’s cycle, not the Sun’s, (the now Transiting Moon. and one’s Progressed Moon, as applied to one’s Birth Chart and Progressed Birth Chart).

So… why do some Astrologers write such hooey for these Newspapers and Magazines? To make a buck, of course. These periodicals want, and pay for, Sun-Sign astrology… whether it’s true and efficacious or not. I don’t think it needs to be said, but I will say it anyway—> NONE of these so-called astrologers, who write for these periodicals, are held in any esteem by the Astrological community.

Hi Kemiqueen, here’s what I found.:smileyhappy: